[tpop3d-discuss] Re: New feature thought / part of TODO / auth_perl_user hook?

[Chris Lightfoot]

On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:37:14AM -0400, Dave Baker wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 10:48:29AM +0100, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:05:26PM -0400, Dave Baker wrote:
> > > 
> > > It seems that apop_only doesn't (shouldn't?) have meaning within a TLS
> > > transaction so as a really quick hit to make tpop3d work for what I need
> > > (I just gained an outlook user ... it doesn't support apop, but will do
> > > tls so that was the final nudge into opening port 995 at the firewall).
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > > Is this so obvious that I'm wasting my time mentioning it?  
> > 
> > No, this is sensible. I've now incorporated this into the
> > CVS version.
> >
> 
> There's actually a buggette in the patch I was meaning to address in that
> it did't correct the CAPA output to reflect the new operation.

Ah, so there is. Hmm. I don't think the spec really allows
CAPA to depend on how the connection has been set up, but
it's probably most sensible to update it as you
suggest....


> Dave, who really should check the CVS version more often to see what else
> is in there ...

Possibly. So far changes from 1.5.2 are:

| Fixed a couple of errors in the man page and configuration directives which
| got lost; thanks to Haris Hudji. Increased the default value for max-children
| from 16 to 100. Fixed a typo in Makefile.am. Incorporated a patch from Diego
| Alvarez to allow substitution variables to be used in LDAP base configurations.
| Altered the apop-only option to affect unsecured connections only, following a
| suggestion by Dave Baker.


-- 
Blow your mind. Smoke gunpowder.