[Iftop-users] Isn't this list moderated?

richard lucassen reply3 at lucassen.org
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:05:07 +0200


On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:28:07 +0100
Chris Lightfoot <chris@ex-parrot.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:20:01AM +0200, richard lucassen wrote:
> > I thought this list was a moderated list, but apparently it is not
> > and spamassassin accepts some spam:
> > 
> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12
> > FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63-sa_mythic
> > 
> > I think it's a good idea to moderate the list because there's not
> > much traffic on it. And a "grep iftop <BODY>" should be a good
> > additional filter ;-)
> 
> Well, that's up to Paul, though as you say traffic is low
> enough that moderating is probably practical. I guess
> you're not volunteering?

Uhhhhhh, uhhhhh... ;-)

> (TBH I hadn't noticed the spam -- I guess it gets
> filtered.)

I have no spam filtering here. I use the following good working trick: I
use "spamtrap@lucassen.org" as "from address". This address exists. I
discovered that such an address is filtered by harvesters because this
address can be found thousands of times on the net in newsgroups and so
on. Sometimes they only cut off the word "spam" as I can see that spam
is sent to "trap@lucassen.org", which does not exist. For replies I use
another address which is not (yet) harvested (too much work for
harvesters and thus not effective, I think)

IMHO a grep on /\ iftop\ / must be a good help for the moderator ;-)

Richard.